A peaceful landscape transforms into a harbinger of dread as helicopters darken the skies. Beneath them, a pack of wolves — proud and majestic rulers of the night — scatter in panic to the deafening sound of gunfire echoing through the forest. To no avail. The rain of bullets lacerates the flesh and shatters the bones. It ruptures the insides. Bloodbath never ceases; all legal, all approved and paid with taxpayers’ money.
Read More
Disregarding the individual is not only antithetical to appreciating sentience but also detrimental to enhancing conservation efforts. An ethical failure goes hand in hand with an ecological one.
Read More
Hunting organizations distorted opposition to trophy hunting, painting it as emotionally motivated and scientifically invalid, but this opposition is firmly founded in science. It is both ethically and morally wrong to inflict suffering on sentient beings and endanger grizzly populations for frivolous entertainment
Read More
The objectification of wildlife and the use of euphemisms have stripped wild animals of their cognitive and emotional domains. The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation (NAM) perpetuates this objectification by defining wild animals as “public trust resources” that are “renewable” if managed “wisely.”
The technocratic, euphemistic language and the objectification of wildlife have normalized hunting, making it psychologically acceptable for hunters.
As a society, we are moving away from the dominance paradigm and increasingly embracing the mutualism paradigm. Social values are not static, and what was once acceptable is no longer. Therefore, the death and suffering of sentient creatures necessitate redefining what the best science really means and complementing it with social and ethical values predominating in the twentieth century.
Read More